Households’ willingness to engage in demand response in the Finnish retail electricity market: an empirical study
Annala, Salla (2015-10-02)
Väitöskirja
Annala, Salla
02.10.2015
Lappeenranta University of Technology
Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-265-850-0
https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-265-850-0
Tiivistelmä
If electricity users adjusted their consumption patterns according to time-variable electricity
prices or other signals about the state of the power system, generation and network assets could
be used more efficiently, and matching intermittent renewable power generation with electricity
demand would be facilitated. This kind of adjustment of electricity consumption, or demand
response, may be based on consumers’ decisions to shift or reduce electricity use in response to
time-variable electricity prices or on the remote control of consumers’ electric appliances.
However, while demand response is suggested as a solution to many issues in power systems,
actual experiences from demand response programs with residential customers are mainly limited
to short pilots with a small number of voluntary participants, and information about what kinds
of changes consumers are willing and able to make and what motivates these changes is scarce.
This doctoral dissertation contributes to the knowledge about what kinds of factors impact on
residential consumers’ willingness and ability to take part in demand response. Saving
opportunities calculated with actual price data from the Finnish retail electricity market are
compared with the occurred supplier switching to generate a first estimate about how large
savings could trigger action also in the case of demand response. Residential consumers’ motives
to participate in demand response are also studied by a web-based survey with 2103 responses.
Further, experiences of households with electricity consumption monitoring systems are
discussed to increase knowledge about consumers’ interest in getting more information on their
electricity use and adjusting their behavior based on it. Impacts of information on willingness to
participate in demand response programs are also approached by a survey for experts of their
willingness to engage in demand response activities. Residential customers seem ready to allow remote control of electric appliances that does not
require changes in their everyday routines. Based on residents’ own activity, the electricity
consuming activities that are considered shiftable are very limited. In both cases, the savings in
electricity costs required to allow remote control or to engage in demand response activities are
relatively high. Nonmonetary incentives appeal to fewer households.
prices or other signals about the state of the power system, generation and network assets could
be used more efficiently, and matching intermittent renewable power generation with electricity
demand would be facilitated. This kind of adjustment of electricity consumption, or demand
response, may be based on consumers’ decisions to shift or reduce electricity use in response to
time-variable electricity prices or on the remote control of consumers’ electric appliances.
However, while demand response is suggested as a solution to many issues in power systems,
actual experiences from demand response programs with residential customers are mainly limited
to short pilots with a small number of voluntary participants, and information about what kinds
of changes consumers are willing and able to make and what motivates these changes is scarce.
This doctoral dissertation contributes to the knowledge about what kinds of factors impact on
residential consumers’ willingness and ability to take part in demand response. Saving
opportunities calculated with actual price data from the Finnish retail electricity market are
compared with the occurred supplier switching to generate a first estimate about how large
savings could trigger action also in the case of demand response. Residential consumers’ motives
to participate in demand response are also studied by a web-based survey with 2103 responses.
Further, experiences of households with electricity consumption monitoring systems are
discussed to increase knowledge about consumers’ interest in getting more information on their
electricity use and adjusting their behavior based on it. Impacts of information on willingness to
participate in demand response programs are also approached by a survey for experts of their
willingness to engage in demand response activities. Residential customers seem ready to allow remote control of electric appliances that does not
require changes in their everyday routines. Based on residents’ own activity, the electricity
consuming activities that are considered shiftable are very limited. In both cases, the savings in
electricity costs required to allow remote control or to engage in demand response activities are
relatively high. Nonmonetary incentives appeal to fewer households.
Kokoelmat
- Väitöskirjat [1099]