Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • LUTPub
  • Tieteelliset julkaisut
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • LUTPub
  • Tieteelliset julkaisut
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Carbon footprint evaluation of biofertilizers

Havukainen, Jouni; Uusitalo, Ville; Koistinen, Katariina; Liikanen, Miia; Horttanainen, Mika (2018)

Katso/Avaa
havukainen_et_al_carbon_footprint_publishers_version.pdf (397.5Kb)
Lataukset: 


Publishers version

Havukainen, Jouni
Uusitalo, Ville
Koistinen, Katariina
Liikanen, Miia
Horttanainen, Mika
2018

International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning

13

8

1050-1060

WIT Press

School of Energy Systems

Kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
© 2018 WIT Press
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N8-1050-1060
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2018122051400

Tiivistelmä

The prevailing large-scale use of chemical fertilizers has been affecting environmental degradation. a broken nutrient cycle has caused problems worldwide, which are related to the question of how to feed 9 billion people by 2050 while limiting human operations within the planetary boundaries. Indispensable nutrients, phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N), often leak because of human activities, such as food production. efficient nutrient recycling can alleviate the problem. This study focuses on biofertilizers as a solution for the problem of a broken nutrient cycle. The study quantified the environmental benefits of using biofertilizers by calculating the carbon footprints of P and N in organic fertilizers by using the life cycle assessment (lCa) method on an existing biogas plant. The emissions from common production processes are allocated between products and co-products. however, whether a side flow is regarded as a co-product or waste is sometimes unclear. according to ISO 14040 and the greenhouse gas (GhG) protocol, if a substance does not have a value or the holder intends to dispose it, it can be regarded as waste. allocation of emission can be done according to parameters such as energy content, mass, or monetary value. The composted digestate was considered valuable; the allocation between biogas and nutrients was conducted according to the value of biogas and recycled fertilizers.

The calculated carbon footprints were 0.8 kgCO2,eq./kg for N and 1.8 kgCO2,eq./kg for P, whereas the carbon footprints for mineral fertilizers were 1.9–7.8 kgCO2,eq./kg for N and 2.3–4.5 kgCO2,eq./kg for P. The reduction of GhG emission in organic fertilizer production in comparison with the emission in mineral fertilizer production was on average 78% for N and 41% for P. On the other hand, inclusion of N2O and Ch4 emissions from composting increases the carbon footprints of nitrogen and phosphorus but there is high uncertainty included with these emissions. The value of nutrients in the biofertilizers is also uncertain but the interest towards using of them is increasing in Finland.

Lähdeviite

Havukainen, J., Uusitalo, V., Koistinen, K., Liikanen, M., Horttanainen, M. (2018). Carbon footprint evaluation of biofertilizers. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, vol. 13, iss. 8, pp. 1050-1060. DOI: 10.2495/SDP-V13-N8-1050-1060

Alkuperäinen verkko-osoite

https://www.witpress.com/elibrary/sdp-volumes/13/8/2355
Kokoelmat
  • Tieteelliset julkaisut [1560]
LUT-yliopisto
PL 20
53851 Lappeenranta
Ota yhteyttä | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetKoulutusohjelmaAvainsanatSyöttöajatYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy
LUT-yliopisto
PL 20
53851 Lappeenranta
Ota yhteyttä | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste