Is a Capacity Remuneration Mechanism Worth the Cost? A Case Study of Finland
Salmi, Jasmin; Honkapuro, Samuli (2025-12-30)
Post-print / Final draft
Salmi, Jasmin
Honkapuro, Samuli
30.12.2025
IEEE
IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe
School of Energy Systems
Kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
© 2025 IEEE
© 2025 IEEE
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601082067
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601082067
Tiivistelmä
This case study analyzes the costs and profitability of a capacity remuneration mechanism in Finland. The capacity remuneration mechanism provides an annual capacity payment to owners for maintaining sufficient capacity to address scarcity events. Two approaches are used: a linear model, linking the annual payment to electricity prices, and a stochastic model, incorporating uncertainties via Monte Carlo simulation. The capacity payments are approximately €68000/MW/year for a gas turbine, and €110000/MW/year for a CCGT regardless of the model used. Considering the total capacity required to cover all scarcity events in Finland, the annual cost is estimated at €51–150 million for a gas turbine, and €73–261 million for a CCGT, corresponding to an additional electricity cost of €0.62– 3.19 per each MWh consumed in Finland. By comparison, the annual value of lost load is clearly lower, at around €31.6 million per year.
Lähdeviite
J. Salmi and S. Honkapuro, "Is a Capacity Remuneration Mechanism Worth the Cost? A Case Study of Finland," 2025 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe), Valletta, Malta, 2025, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ISGTEurope64741.2025.11305613
Alkuperäinen verkko-osoite
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11305613Kokoelmat
- Tieteelliset julkaisut [1857]
