Greenhouse gas emissions from peat and biomass-derived fuels, electricity and heat — Estimation of various production chains by using LCA methodology
Väisänen, Sanni (2014-02-07)
Väitöskirja
Väisänen, Sanni
07.02.2014
Lappeenranta University of Technology
Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-265-557-8
https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-265-557-8
Tiivistelmä
More discussion is required on how and which types of biomass should be used to
achieve a significant reduction in the carbon load released into the atmosphere in the
short term. The energy sector is one of the largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters and
thus its role in climate change mitigation is important. Replacing fossil fuels with biomass
has been a simple way to reduce carbon emissions because the carbon bonded to
biomass is considered as carbon neutral. With this in mind, this thesis has the following
objectives: (1) to study the significance of the different GHG emission sources related
to energy production from peat and biomass, (2) to explore opportunities to develop
more climate friendly biomass energy options and (3) to discuss the importance of biogenic
emissions of biomass systems. The discussion on biogenic carbon and other GHG
emissions comprises four case studies of which two consider peat utilization, one forest
biomass and one cultivated biomasses. Various different biomass types (peat, pine logs
and forest residues, palm oil, rapeseed oil and jatropha oil) are used as examples to
demonstrate the importance of biogenic carbon to life cycle GHG emissions. The biogenic
carbon emissions of biomass are defined as the difference in the carbon stock between
the utilization and the non-utilization scenarios of biomass. Forestry-drained
peatlands were studied by using the high emission values of the peatland types in question
to discuss the emission reduction potential of the peatlands. The results are presented
in terms of global warming potential (GWP) values. Based on the results, the climate
impact of the peat production can be reduced by selecting high-emission-level peatlands for peat production. The comparison of the two different types of forest biomass in integrated
ethanol production in pulp mill shows that the type of forest biomass impacts the
biogenic carbon emissions of biofuel production. The assessment of cultivated biomasses
demonstrates that several selections made in the production chain significantly affect
the GHG emissions of biofuels. The emissions caused by biofuel can exceed the emissions
from fossil-based fuels in the short term if biomass is in part consumed in the process
itself and does not end up in the final product. Including biogenic carbon and other
land use carbon emissions into the carbon footprint calculations of biofuel reveals the
importance of the time frame and of the efficiency of biomass carbon content utilization.
As regards the climate impact of biomass energy use, the net impact on carbon stocks
(in organic matter of soils and biomass), compared to the impact of the replaced energy
source, is the key issue. Promoting renewable biomass regardless of biogenic GHG
emissions can increase GHG emissions in the short term and also possibly in the long
term.
achieve a significant reduction in the carbon load released into the atmosphere in the
short term. The energy sector is one of the largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters and
thus its role in climate change mitigation is important. Replacing fossil fuels with biomass
has been a simple way to reduce carbon emissions because the carbon bonded to
biomass is considered as carbon neutral. With this in mind, this thesis has the following
objectives: (1) to study the significance of the different GHG emission sources related
to energy production from peat and biomass, (2) to explore opportunities to develop
more climate friendly biomass energy options and (3) to discuss the importance of biogenic
emissions of biomass systems. The discussion on biogenic carbon and other GHG
emissions comprises four case studies of which two consider peat utilization, one forest
biomass and one cultivated biomasses. Various different biomass types (peat, pine logs
and forest residues, palm oil, rapeseed oil and jatropha oil) are used as examples to
demonstrate the importance of biogenic carbon to life cycle GHG emissions. The biogenic
carbon emissions of biomass are defined as the difference in the carbon stock between
the utilization and the non-utilization scenarios of biomass. Forestry-drained
peatlands were studied by using the high emission values of the peatland types in question
to discuss the emission reduction potential of the peatlands. The results are presented
in terms of global warming potential (GWP) values. Based on the results, the climate
impact of the peat production can be reduced by selecting high-emission-level peatlands for peat production. The comparison of the two different types of forest biomass in integrated
ethanol production in pulp mill shows that the type of forest biomass impacts the
biogenic carbon emissions of biofuel production. The assessment of cultivated biomasses
demonstrates that several selections made in the production chain significantly affect
the GHG emissions of biofuels. The emissions caused by biofuel can exceed the emissions
from fossil-based fuels in the short term if biomass is in part consumed in the process
itself and does not end up in the final product. Including biogenic carbon and other
land use carbon emissions into the carbon footprint calculations of biofuel reveals the
importance of the time frame and of the efficiency of biomass carbon content utilization.
As regards the climate impact of biomass energy use, the net impact on carbon stocks
(in organic matter of soils and biomass), compared to the impact of the replaced energy
source, is the key issue. Promoting renewable biomass regardless of biogenic GHG
emissions can increase GHG emissions in the short term and also possibly in the long
term.
Kokoelmat
- Väitöskirjat [1025]